Login With Facebook
Tuesday, September 25, 2018

Flash: Dead in a flash! Featured

Written by 

Many rock stars have hailed in their songs that Rock & Roll will never die, but the same may not be true for the ubiquitous  interactive technology we know as Flash.  We spent all this time adopting it, and now it is over.

It's painful, I know.  I am the biggest fan of the technology.  I love to think back at what is used to mean to me in terms of the endless possibilities.  And the truth of the matter is that the Flash technology itself IS "all that, and a bag of chips."   The problem is that is no longer fits within the political and technological landscape of the future of the internet.  HTML5, developed as a product of the "open source" movement, looks down upon the third-party plug-in concept.  Wether HTML 5 will be the ultimate replacement to flash is still very much open to debate.  More than likely data base fed content management systems such as Joomla and Dupral, will fill a large portion of this gap, and much of the rest will continue to use the custom Javascript model.  Back in its day, Flash fought a tough fight to earn its place as the champion of interactive web applications.  Developers spend endless amounts of time and energy

minimizing the drawbacks of plug-ins, and succeeded in persuading the entire web community to overcome their hesitation and adopt Flash as the de facto technology for interactive web applications. Every good web citizen young and old learned how to implement the flash plug in and a whole score of creative talent built careers on providing implementations of the technology.  It was ubiquitous, media rich, relatively easy, and it seemed to be here to stay.  For years it held the thrown in its kingdom.

Recently, by refusing to allow Flash to be implemented on the iPhone, Apple has flexed its market muscle and essentially declared that Flash is dead.

While it is true that most flash programmers, artists, and developers used windows based platforms to develop flash apps, simply because the flash authoring environment functioned better on windows, I doubt this was the reason Apple went on a mission to oust Flash from the interactive thrown.  At least not the main reason.

Apple instead has  chosen to back HTML 5 as the rich web application technology of the future.  It's a solution that does not yet exist BTW.

The concept has it merits of course.  The idea being, lets' not have all our cool multimedia web experiences be dependent on third party technologies, that create difficulties in that they are proprietary, non standard, need updates, and put power in the hands of companies other than the big browser builders that HTML5 specification caters too.

Well, that's all true and fine, but we have already overcome all those hurdles.  Everyone has already agreed that flash is the standard for video, and everyone has already come to terms with that they have to deal with installing a plug in to get cool stuff.  In fact everyone, already has the flash plug-in.

So we've overcome all those hurdles, and its working well, and adobe as been great in ongoing development, but we want to throw that all away, in favor of the way it should be, or they way it makes the most sense ,even though it doesn't in fact exist yet, and to add to that, it doesn't even promise to come even close to the interactive offering that flash offers.

What is promises is to make video and several other interactive elements like drag and drop, part of the browsers functionality, and therefore universal and standard, and without the problems associated with plug-ins.  That is a noble cause, but at what price?

For a while XML and then XHTML were touted as the "end all" of the future of the web.  The XML movement promised to set all things straight in terms of web development.  The power of XML, the strict, precise syntax, would solve all evils of the past.  This concept was eventually abandoned in favor of keeping the web running.  Probably a wise choice, but in terms of HTML 5, and the refusal to include a flash standard or transitional element, is certainly setting web video and interactive standards back 10 years.  What makes Flash a "third party Plug In" instead of a technology that could be incorporated into the standard?  I don't know.  Clout perhaps.  You know, Abode is a third party.  Third party to whom?

Well Abode is only a company that competed and offered solutions heads and tails above that of the "non-third parties" offerings, and won its market presence based on the actual innovation that their "third party" competitive status help create.  They were successful in a free market, and the technology is still superior to anything HTML5 can even promise to offer, yet they have been deemed "not part of the future, because the big browser builders do not want to be beholden to "third party" plug ins.  Well, they are not "plug ins," if you incorporate them into the standard, and they are only third part because you are competitive with them and bigger so you can call them third parties.

Instead of perhaps appreciating and realizing the value in a technology that an independent, third party cold come up with that can outperform the best offerings to this date, and welcoming them to to be part of the first party, you pass them of as offenders of the wave of the future, and expel them from the new standard.

The thing that your missing here is that the competition and open market that gave Fash its unanimous position, its also responsible for making the technology exceptional, and when we create standards based strictly on what the browser builders think would be best, and standardize in the name of simplicity and "neat code for developers". We also lose the benefits of a competitive market.

So, while I am all for web standards, and the benefits that can be gained by them, conceptually.  It sort of like an analogy for socialism versus capitalism.

There are not many who would argue the philosophical benefits of the utopian ideal of socialism.  History has shown us that it is only the theory that is true.  I suggest the same for the brandish movement for standardization, based on the desires of a small amount of browser developers, and at the sacrifice of the gains that a free market can generate out of creative solutions to market competition.  Such solutions of with Flash was born.

And the whole practical reason why this is even an issue... is apple's refusal to allow flash on any of its mobile devices.  The truth is flash is not dead. In fact it is everywhere alive, but not well.  Well, it's well in itself, but without apple's support for it on their mobile devices, as a developer, it becomes no longer a viable solution.  Unless you want o make different versions of your site for different outlets, which ironically is what web standards are supposed to do away with, you have to create with non flash interactivity.

What is non flash interactivity, well that's where the problems begin to outweigh the solutions.  The answer is, no one knows as of yet.  Many have opinions.

Apple states it will not support flash on any of its mobile devices because it is not the wave of the future to have 3rd party plug ins as part of the spec. So what do they offer?  HTML5.  And what can you do with the hypothetical HTML5 at the moment?  Almost nothing.  Certainly cannot replace flash any time soon (in this decade I propose)  So why is Flash being limited from apple's devices.  Greed.

It would be nice if they would at least offer a solution if they are going to outlaw flash from their devices.

And what we are left with if we want to provide video for the web that will work in your browser as well as apple mobile devices, and have forward HTML5 support, is a highly complicated process that involves, multiple versions of your video, and custom scripts to detect the output device and serve accordingly.  Smells like teen spirit to me.  Its undeniably against all the ideals of standardization.  I think its a problem if we use the guise of standardization to smother alpha technologies that won in a fair market, in favor of "standardization, while in actuality, pandering to the profits of a select few companies, and throwing the interactive capabilities of the web back 20 years.

If you want to revise the flash  model, offer an alternative.  If your alternative is this beautiful hypothetical technology that doesn't exist yet, work with the current model and find way to incorporate the current market winning technology into the future specification, or at least create a transitional plan.

This is not the first time Apple has quashed a superior technology.  Nor is it the first time Apple has destroyed the hard work and livelihood on many dedicated artists and technicians in the name of their bottom line, ad the sacrifice of society.

What are your thoughts on this subject?

Can you think of other examples of this?

Please contribute by commenting below.

Thank you.

 

 

 

Read 49121 times Last modified on Friday, 23 September 2011 16:26
John Cirabisi

Hobbies include: Building bridges, creating synergy, and examining all-things-media. Oh, and crochet.

Email This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

2865 comments

  • Comment Link Sonjakax Thursday, 28 September 2017 16:49 posted by Sonjakax

    2017 top rated mattresses reviews mattress toppers sale mattresses in maine twin size air mattress measurements
    queen mattress sizes inches mattress reviews 2015 cheap mattresses bangor maine mattress stores in new jersey
    twin mattress size in inches mattress top rated 2017 for comfort best mattresses for lower back pain 2015 futon mattress reviews compare

    best mattresses for 2017 mattress stores portland maine memory foam mattress topper walmart mattress stores nyc
    mattresses 2015 best mattresses 2015 full size mattress measurements king size mattress dimensions uk
    mattresses in oklahoma city 2015 top rated mattresses best foam mattresses 2016 made in usa consumer reports mattress reviews 2014

  • Comment Link Lmazamibly Thursday, 28 September 2017 15:35 posted by Lmazamibly

    bad check to a mississippi payday loan
    online payday loans
    200 cash payday loan
    [url=https://paydayrvyaf.com/]cash advance near me[/url] ’

  • Comment Link Abrahamdiusy Thursday, 28 September 2017 13:21 posted by Abrahamdiusy

    viagra pills for men
    viagra for men
    viagra side effects for men
    viagra spray for men

  • Comment Link LucienRuh Thursday, 28 September 2017 13:20 posted by LucienRuh

    viagra 100mg price
    viagra price cvs
    price of viagra at walmart
    viagra street price

  • Comment Link RichardByday Thursday, 28 September 2017 13:12 posted by RichardByday

    best over the counter viagra
    viagra equivalent over the counter
    can you buy viagra over the counter
    how to get viagra over the counter

  • Comment Link Ernestkar Thursday, 28 September 2017 13:12 posted by Ernestkar

    what does viagra cost
    viagra 100mg cost
    viagra prescription cost
    cost of viagra at cvs

  • Comment Link Lmazamibly Thursday, 28 September 2017 13:10 posted by Lmazamibly

    loanmax title loan
    cash advance on credit card
    get loan online
    [url=https://paydayrvyaf.com/]cash advance loan[/url] ’

  • Comment Link RobertDiumn Thursday, 28 September 2017 12:55 posted by RobertDiumn

    viagra vs cialis reviews
    cialis vs viagra recreational use
    viagra vs cialis
    viagra vs cialis forum

  • Comment Link EdwardIneno Thursday, 28 September 2017 12:55 posted by EdwardIneno

    free coupon for viagra
    viagra free sample coupon
    coupon for viagra
    free viagra coupon

  • Comment Link LutherPhync Thursday, 28 September 2017 12:53 posted by LutherPhync

    best places to buy viagra
    buy viagra online canadian
    where to buy viagra
    cheapest place to buy viagra

  • Comment Link Thomasriply Thursday, 28 September 2017 12:53 posted by Thomasriply

    best place to buy viagra online
    best place to buy viagra online
    viagra online cheap
    viagra online canadian pharmacy

  • Comment Link Aaronbreep Thursday, 28 September 2017 12:23 posted by Aaronbreep

    wh0cd157019 cialis amex order generic cialis online http://cialis365.us.com/ more helpful hints doxycycline price http://doxycyclineprice.us.org/

  • Comment Link Davidanill Thursday, 28 September 2017 12:03 posted by Davidanill

    next day delivery viagra online
    viagra buy pharmacy
    can buy viagra walmart
    how does viagra cost
    compare prices sildenafil

  • Comment Link Jesusplemn Thursday, 28 September 2017 05:54 posted by Jesusplemn

    viagra and arginine together
    viagra sale sydney
    cheapest online viagra uk
    cheap viagra men
    viagra 50 mg vs 25 mg

  • Comment Link JesusFoelp Thursday, 28 September 2017 04:52 posted by JesusFoelp

    how to get the best results using viagra
    viagra for sale in boots
    online pharmacy buy viagra
    order viagra sample
    50 mg viagra

  • Comment Link Evan Thursday, 28 September 2017 01:41 posted by Evan

    https://easycarup.com/ - top auto insurance companies in florida
    auto insurance pip
    auto insurance growth rate

  • Comment Link Jamesbar Wednesday, 27 September 2017 20:15 posted by Jamesbar

    viagra sale non prescription
    legal to order viagra online
    where can we get viagra in india
    order viagra canada pharmacy
    foros viagra generico

  • Comment Link JamesJebra Wednesday, 27 September 2017 20:09 posted by JamesJebra

    pink viagra pill
    cheap 100mg viagra
    100mg viagra does not work
    viagra sale sa
    herbal viagra compare prices

  • Comment Link Bennychibe Wednesday, 27 September 2017 20:02 posted by Bennychibe

    wh0cd151213 erythromycin erythromycin online http://erythromycin500mg.us.org/

  • Comment Link MichaelPycle Wednesday, 27 September 2017 17:48 posted by MichaelPycle

    wh0cd200265 GENERIC PROMETRIUM prometrium http://prometrium.us.com/

Leave a comment

Sign in, or Register to remove reCaptcha security step.

Sponsored Partner Bottom

Follow us on